|
The
government has failed in its mandate
to preserve the peace
Sunday, May 26, 2002
Dear Editor,
Ever since the PPP/C
came to power in 1992, its anti-crime policy has been
atrocious. In its latest effort to combat the crime crisis, it has
announced a public anti-crime campaign involving marches, cycle
rides, et cetera. I do not object to marches for such a message, but
I have one question for the organizers; "In whose name do we
march?"
Assuming that one can ignore the crime situation between 92-2000, it
is impossible to disregard a landscape plagued by criminal
disobedience for the past 14 months or so. More or less, from
the 2001 elections to present, the growing list of publicized deaths
resulting from criminal attacks (non-domestic related) is
staggering; Rajnauth Mahadeo, Donna McKinnon, Mervyn Barran,
Bemchand Barran, Dhanpaul Jagdeo, David Kissoondai, Rahamat Ali, Garvin
France, Savitri Persaud, G. Boyce, Sgt. E. Aldredge, Shabudeen
Kassim, Jagdai Singh, Deonarine Sahadeo, Troy
Williams, Paul Hardeo, Errol Butcher, Leon Fraser, Gavin Sobers, Harry
Kooseram, Mark Sancho, Sita
Persaud, Ramdeo Persaud, Chetram Etwaroo...and
counting.
Before requesting public support, someone from Freedom
House should ask crime victims who survived (many of
whom are women that have been brutalized and humiliated in numerous
ways), like Ester Budram (Fryish, Corentyne) or Sumintra
Roberts (Edinburgh, Berbice) what it means to have a
cutlass or a gun butt rammed into one's skull; they should inquire
from Babita Bhola (Stanleytown, WCD) or Indrani John (Rampoor,
Berbice) how they felt when bandits placed guns at their babies'
heads. Whoever is busy arranging marches should tell the public what
to say if the children of the aforementioned deceased ask, "In
whose name should we march?" When Freedom House says that
people should march, it means, naturally, that Indian people should
be striding down the roads.
I don't think the Indian community is in the mood for marches and
bike rides and rallies, nor do I think they should be. Their primary
concern should be getting the government to do what it should have
done a long time ago, make it safe for them to exist. Since the
Indian population is the core of the government's support base, and
the Indian population has borne the brunt of criminal attacks, one
must deduce that the Indian population has either voted for its own
destruction and humiliation, or it has been deceived by the
government. Regardless, the 2001 mandate has failed to bring
security which, incidentally, is still the government's first
priority to all Guyanese.
It is no secret that what is happening is pointing us into the
direction of the terrible past; at least psychologically for anyone
connected to a crime victim. The sheer horror of it all-memories of
blood, parents beaten or gunned down, graveyard journeys, constant
apprehension, is leading to immense hatred. It is a cruel fate to
offer the children waiting in the maternity wards across this
country. Every kind of hell has a way out; if we have not found a
way out of this one, it is because we have not exhausted every
possible means of locating the desired path.
As it is, the people asked to march are both angry with those who
attack and those who should be preventing these attacks. The onus
has always been on the PPP/C
to use all means at its disposal-this includes the military
especially, to ensure domestic security is never compromised. There
is evidence suggesting that this has not been done, leaving the
public, especially on the East Coast and in Georgetown, at extreme
risk. This government was given a job to perform-people want the job
to be done. They are tired of receiving condolences and
compensations, and seeing government officials at wake houses; they
want a government to govern at all costs and not merely
"be" in office. A government must rule; if this government
cannot do this, then we have a greater problem than crime.
Until then I see no reason for anyone to march for or with the
PPP/C. I see no reason for the PPP/C to believe that it can keep its
supporters hemmed in, and then, whenever it wants, call for their
support. The PPP/C does not deserve support in this aspect of their
rule, and they know this. It is time the supporters of the PPP/C
know and respect this. Otherwise they will end up in a cemetery or
on the Atlantic foreshore one by one, and instead of writing
letters, I will have to write obituaries.
If anyone really wants to march, then march (in
memory of all crime victims) on the PPP/C with one
demand-exercise the mandate militarily to arrest the rampage of
criminal activities now and not next year. After all, it is a
legitimate task for the legitimate government of this legitimate
nation.
Yours faithfully,
Rakesh Rampertab
|
|